Fight Female Pattern Hair Loss with LEIMO

Fight Female Pattern Hair Loss with LEIMO!

November 20, 2013
Brisbane, AU – According to a study conducted by Gan and Sinclair in 2005, only 43% of women aged 80 years and above show no evidence of Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) or Androgenetic alopecia. It is the most common cause of hair loss in women and its frequency escalates with age.

Most women affected with this condition become psychologically distressed and socially dysfunctional. It is a chronic progressive condition that needs to be treated. And with the rise of new technologies specifically designed for hair regrowth, it can be daunting to choose which ones have high levels of efficacy.

With the advent of new components related to hair regrowth, InnovaDerma™ International offers a new and radical product that combats hair loss especially for women—LEIMO for Her.
LEIMO for Her is a complete restoration kit specifically made for women suffering from Female pattern hair loss. It has all the vital components for hair regrowth and hair refurbishment, especially made for women.

LEIMO Vitality Shampoo
LEIMO Vitality Shampoo gives maximum volume and a silky shine to the hair. It is formulated with the Bio-Growth System, a potent component that helps cleanse, strengthen and moisturize the hair. The shampoo is made from high-grade ingredients such as fennel, mistletoes and silk proteins, which helps in knocking out residue and increases moisture retention.

LEIMO ProTense Conditioner
This conditioner mollifies and hydrates and gives intensive nourishment to fine, limp and thinning hair from root to tip. It single-handedly strengthens and restores each hair fiber from within, to make hair outstandingly fuller.

LEIMO Follicle Boost Therapy
Infused with Biotin and Saw Palmetto extracts, the therapy contains antioxidants to protect hair follicles from damage and hair loss. It hinders hair loss DHT accumulation all the while boosting hair volume and consistency.

LEIMO BioPlex Scalp Serum
Formulated to thicken and rejuvenate dormant hair follicles, LEIMO BioPlex Scalp Serum is an innovated formula infused with Biotin. It prevents hair loss as well as energizes the scalp for a healthy and livelier hair regrowth.

LEIMO Scalp & Body Exfoliating Spa
Naturally made to wash away pore accumulation of dirt and dead skin cells, it exfoliates the scalp without drying or damaging. It invigorates and refreshes the outermost layer of the scalp for a smooth regrowth of hair.

LEIMO for Her is a product of InnovaDerma™ International, a cutting-edge and revolutionary firm that produces the latest trends in beauty, wellness and skincare. LEIMO is also available for men. Visit www.innovaderma.com or www.leimo.com.au for more information on the available products online. LEIMO is also available at 1800-280-250 for any kind of inquiry, from 7 am to 11 pm daily.

The Senate in Australia

About the Senate

The Senate is one of the two houses of the Australian Federal Parliament. It consists of 76 senators, twelve from each of the six states and two from each of the mainland territories. It shares the power to make laws with the other House of Parliament, the House of Representatives. The Senate is elected by proportional representation, so that its composition closely reflects the voting pattern of the electors.

Powers

The powers of the two houses of the Commonwealth Parliament, the Senate and the House of Representatives, are defined by the Australian Constitution. All proposed laws (bills) must be passed by both houses. The Senate's law-making powers are equal to those of the House of Representatives except that it cannot introduce or amend proposed laws that authorise expenditure for the ordinary annual services of the government or that impose taxation. The Senate can, however, request that the House of Representatives make amendments to financial legislation and it can refuse to pass any bill.

Composition

Under the Constitution, each state of the Australian federation, regardless of its population, has an equal number of senators. The Senate currently consists of 76 senators. Twelve senators represent each of the six states, elected for a period of six years. A system of rotation, however, ensures that half the Senate retires every three years. The four senators who represent the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory are elected concurrently with members of the House of Representatives and the duration of their terms of office coincide with those for that House (a maximum of three years). 

The Senate is elected by a system of proportional representation which ensures that the composition of the Senate more accurately reflects the votes of the electors than the method used to elect members of the House of Representatives.

Role

The Senate is a house of review and a powerful check on the government of the day. The proportional representation system of voting used to elect senators makes it easier for independents and the candidates of the smaller parties to be elected. In recent decades this has meant that the government party usually does not have a majority of votes in the Senate and the non–government senators are able to use their combined voting power to reject or amend government legislation. The Senate's large and active committee system also enables senators to inquire into policy issues in depth and to scrutinise the way laws and policies are administered by ministers and public servants.

Senate committees

The Senate’s role as a house of review and as a watchdog of the executive branch of government has led to the development of a comprehensive range of committees which may investigate matters of public policy and scrutinise proposed legislation and the details of government expenditure and administration. Most senators are actively involved in the work of three or four of these committees. 

Senate committees fall into two categories—Select and Standing. 

A select committee is one appointed by the Senate to inquire into some specific matter and to report back to the Senate within a set time. Once a select committee has submitted its final report to the Senate its work is done and it ceases to exist. 

A standing committee is a permanent committee of the Senate. It stands—or remains—for the life of the whole of any one Parliament, its members being appointed at the commencement of each Parliament. There are three groups of standing committees:

Domestic committees 

These committees deal with matters relating to the internal operations of the Senate, including publications, appropriations and staffing, procedure, privileges, library services, the provision of facilities in Parliament House and senators’ pecuniary and other interests.

Legislative scrutiny committees 

All bills and subordinate legislative instruments that come before Parliament are scrutinised by either the Scrutiny of Bills Committee or the Regulations and Ordinances Committee to ensure that they conform to certain principles mainly concerned with personal rights and civil liberties. 

Legislative and general purpose standing committees 

These committees examine legislation, government administration and public policy. The committees are divided along subject lines and cover between them all areas of government responsibility.

In the Australian system of government, ministers and public servants are accountable to the Parliament for the use of the public resources with which they have been entrusted. Legislative and general purpose standing committees carry out the work of inquiring into and reporting on the twice-yearly estimates of proposed government expenditure. In addition, they have a specific mandate to monitor the performance of departments and agencies.  At the estimates hearings senators may directly question ministers and public officials not only about the details of proposed expenditure but also about the objectives, operations and efficiency of the programs for which they are responsible.

Political Dynasty: Anthony

The Anthony family is Australia’s oldest continuous political dynasty. Over nearly seventy years three generations of Anthony's have held the federal seat of Richmond in northern New South Wales, each serving as government ministers. But the patriarch and Gallipoli veteran Larry senior would not recognize the electorate he once represented. This is the story of how one family has weathered dramatic changes in Australian rural life … changes which have ultimately cost them their political birthright.

In this episode of Dynasties we chart the three generations of Anthonys: the patriarch Larry Anthony who served as a minister under Menzies, his son Doug the former deputy prime minister, and his son Larry, a minister in the Howard government.

Larry Senior was a Gallipoli veteran and impoverished banana farmer. He rose from telegraph boy to Post Master General. His son Doug ran a dairy farm and rose to the highest positions in the land. As acting prime minister he ran the country from the family’s beachside summer caravan. Larry Junior is now also a government minister. But in a sign of the times he’s not in charge of a rural portfolio, he’s minister for Children and Youth Affairs. Richmond is a marginal seat, transformed by the seachange movement and the decline of traditional rural industries. We follow Larry Anthony as he fights for the dynasty’s political future in the federal election. 

Dynasties reveals how this distinguished family has coped with life in the public spotlight. Doug’s wife Margot is the family matriarch. She has brought a softer and cultured dimension to the family. As Doug’s confidante she has lived through many of the dramas of Australian politics, from the dismissal of Whitlam to facing the wrath of disgruntled farmers. When she married Doug she had little idea of what lay ahead. Her husband was an accidental politician. Never intending to run for public office, he was talked into it after his father died prematurely.

In the public world of politics it is perhaps harder than anywhere else to be walking in the shadows of your father. In this episode we see how the Anthony’s have dealt with this test. It’s the challenge of creating your own identity, holding to old principles, but also adapting to a changing world.

With the Anthonys we go behind the scenes of a family immersed in public life. Doug remembers staying with his father in Canberra and having bedtime stories read to him by John Curtin. Larry and his siblings speak frankly of his ambitions and his struggle to create a new identity.

But through all the turmoil and intensity of public life, the Anthony family have survived intact and still manage to live as ordinary Australians.

Hubert Lawrence Anthony (1897-1957)

In 1940 he was appointed minister for commerce in the government of Robert Menzies, and in 1941 was appointed minister for transport, the same year that Jessie died suddenly. When the Curtin government came to power Larry Anthony earned a reputation as a pugnacious parliamentary debater. In 1946 he married a 25 year old widow, Lyndall Marion. In 1949 the former telegraph messenger boy was appointed Postmaster General in the Menzies government.

In 1951 he added the portfolio of civil aviation to his ministerial duties and presided over the rapid expansion of Australia's air services, actively encouraging the two-airline policy whereby the major domestic routes were shared between a private airline and the government owned TAA. It was a policy he also followed in the introduction of television to Australia, insisting on a dual system of private and public networks.

In the early '50's Larry Anthony suffered poor health and resigned from the civil aviation portfolio in 1954. He resigned from the ministry in 1956 and died the following year.

John Douglas Anthony

Doug Anthony served in six governments and, as leader of his party (the youngest ever elected), served with seven different leaders of the Liberal Party (as he said once, every time he got up on the floor to dance he found he had a new partner).

He was an MP for more than 26 years, served 16 years as a minister, four years as Deputy Leader of his party and almost 13 years as Leader - six weeks longer than Sir John McEwen, whom he succeeded. His ministerial portfolios included Interior (1964-67), Primary Industry (1967-71), Trade and Industry (1971-72), Overseas Trade (1975-77), National Resources (1975-77), Trade and Resources (1977-83). He was Deputy Prime Minister from 1971-72, and from 1975-83.

Doug Anthony acted formally as Prime Minister for approximately 25 periods ranging from days to months, and informally on many more.

Lawrence James Anthony

After unsuccessfully contesting the seat of Richmond in 1993, Larry won it from the Labor Party in 1996, and won it in the two following elections. He was appointed The Nationals' Whip in 1997 and Parliamentary Secretary for Trade the following year. He became Minister for Community Services in 1999 and Australia's first Minister for Children and Youth Affairs following the 2001 election.

Although Larry achieved his strongest primary vote in the 2004 election, he was defeated on preferences and said he would not contest the seat of Richmond again.

Sytem of Election

In Australia, the election period is three years. That time can be extended by up to 6 months. Having said that, an election can be called for at any time in that three year period. This is a distinct advantage for the party who is actually in Government, because they can call the election at a time that best suits them, when opinion is in their favour. The Prime Minister is the one who actually calls the election, and it is usually something worked out in the Party room by those members who make up the Government side of politics. In the main, there is usually a short period for the campaign, in the main averaging out to around 4 to 7 weeks. In this case the campaign will be of five weeks duration.

Today, two variants of preferential voting and two variants of proportional representation are used for all Australian parliamentary elections. Preferential voting is a majority system which attempts to ensure that a candidate secures an absolute majority of votes. Proportional representation systems are designed to allocate parliamentary seats to parties in proportion to their overall vote.

The supreme law-making institution in Australia—the federal Parliament—has two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Members of the House of Representatives seek re-election each time there is a federal election. The House of Representatives currently has 150 members elected by preferential voting. Proportional representation is used in the Senate.

Compulsory

Voting is compulsory both at federal elections and at elections for the state and territory legislatures. In some states, voting at municipal elections is also compulsory. On average about 5 per cent of enrolled voters fail to vote but prosecutions are rare and the fine, $20, is modest. In recent federal elections, with a voter turnout of approximately 95 per cent, informal voting—blank or not properly completed ballots—has accounted for about 5 per cent of all the votes cast.

Preferential voting

Preferential voting has become the accepted system in the federal and state parliaments of Australia and is used in municipal elections, political party elections, trade union elections, church elections, elections to company boards, voluntary bodies and sports clubs. Under this system, voters number the candidates on the ballot paper in the order of their preference.

In Australia there are two variants of this system: ‘full’ preferential voting, used for the House of Representatives at the federal level and the lower houses in Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory; and ‘optional’ preferential voting, used for the lower houses in New South Wales and Queensland. A partial ‘optional’ preferential voting system is used for Tasmania’s Legislative Council. 

Proportional representation (single transferable vote)

Proportional representation systems were devised to produce ‘proportional’ election results—parties should win parliamentary seats roughly in proportion to the size of their vote. Ideally, 50 per cent of the vote should win about 50 per cent of the seats. Proportional representation is not a single method of election, for there are a number of variations in use, including the single transferable vote, which is a preferential voting system designed to ensure that votes are for individual candidates rather than for party lists. The two variants of this used in Australia: the ‘Senate’ model and the Hare-Clark system.

The ‘Senate’ model elections increases the chances of minor parties and independents winning seats compared to the single member constituency system used for the House of Representatives. It produces closer results in the struggle between the major parties and makes it difficult for a major party to gain control of the Senate and in the upper houses of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia where it is used.

The Hare-Clark version of proportional representation is used for elections for the Tasmanian House of Assembly and the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly. This system ensures that no seat is safe, creates an electoral system where party members fight each other as much as their external opponents and operates in such a way that minority governments are more common than when preferential voting is used.

Australian Constitution

The Australian Constitution is the set of rules by which Australia is governed. Australians voted for the national constitution in a series of referendums. The Australian Constitution establishes the composition of the Australian Parliament, and describes how Parliament works, what powers it has, how federal and state Parliaments share power, and the roles of the Executive Government and the High Court. It took effect on 1 January 1901.

In addition to the national Constitution, each Australian state has its own constitution. The Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory have self-government Acts which were passed by the Australian Parliament.

Features

The Australian Constitution is divided into eight chapters and 128 sections. It sets out the basis for Australia's federal system of governance, the key features of which include:

• a federal Parliament and government, responsible for national decision-making and law-making
• a bicameral Parliament, including the Queen (represented by the Governor-General), the Senate and the House of Representatives
• six state governments, responsible for state matters
• power-sharing arrangements between the federal and state parliaments
• the High Court of Australia, which is the final court of appeal. The High Court interprets the Constitution and decides its meaning, as well as settling disputes between the federal and state governments.

The Constitution does not cover all aspects of the governance of Australia. For example, the Prime Minister and the Cabinet are not mentioned in the Constitution. While central to the way government works, the Prime Minister and Cabinet operate by custom and convention, similar to the British system from which they were derived.

The Constitution does not detail many of the rights of the Australian people. Unlike the United States' Constitution, Australia's does not include a bill of rights, such as the right to free speech. In Australia these rights are protected by common law (made by the decisions of the courts) and laws made by Parliament (statute law).

Changing the Australian Constitution

The Australian Constitution can only be changed with the approval of the Australian people. A proposed change must be approved by the Parliament and then be put to Australians in a referendum. All Australian citizens on the electoral roll vote 'yes' or 'no' to the proposed change. A referendum is only passed if it is approved by a majority of voters in a majority of states, and by a majority of voters across the nation. This is known as a double majority. Territory voters are only counted in the national majority. Since 1901, 19 referendums have proposed 44 changes to the Constitution; only eight changes have been agreed to.

List of Some Department in Australia

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

The Australian Department of Agriculture's role is to develop and implement policies and programs that ensure Australia's agricultural, fisheries, food and forestry industries remain competitive, profitable and sustainable.

Our policies and programs:

• encourage and support sustainable natural resource use and management
• protect the health and safety of plant and animal industries
• enable industries to adapt to compete in a fast-changing international and economic environment.
• help improve market access and market performance for the agricultural and food sector
• encourage and assist industries to adopt new technology and practices, and
• assist primary producers and the food industry to develop business and marketing skills, and to be financially self-reliant.

The department employs about 4500 Full Time Equivalent staff in Australia and overseas, including policy officers, program administrators, economists, meat inspectors, researchers, veterinary officers, communicators and project managers. Our staff work in places as varied as offices, airports, mail centres, shipping ports, laboratories and abattoirs; located in regional centres, rural communities and capital cities.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND AGEING

History of the Department

The Department of Health was established in 1921 and has since undergone a number of changes in its name function and structure. The changes are briefly outlined below, including name changes, Health Ministers and Heads of Department.

Background

The Department of Health was established in 1921 and has since undergone a number of changes in its name, function and structure. 

The first change was in 1987 when the Department of Health was merged with the Department of Community Services to form the Department of Community Services and Health. 

The Department of Health, Housing and Community Services was then formed in June 1991, reflecting the transfer of housing industry programs from the Department of Industry, Technology and Commerce to the Department of Community Services and Health. 

In March 1993 the Department of Local Government joined with the Department of Health, Housing and Community Services to form the Department of Health, Housing, Local Government and Community Services. Subsequently, in 1994, the Department's name was changed to the Department of Human Services and Health. 

When a new government was elected in March 1996, the department's name changed to the Department of Health and Family Services. At this time, it gained responsibility for the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program from the former Department of Housing and Regional Development. 

The department later assumed responsibility for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health matters from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission. 

After the October 1998 election, the department's name changed to the Department of Health and Aged Care to reflect its new responsibilities and functions. Responsibility for Family and Children's Services, Disability Programs and the Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service were transferred to the Department of Family and Community Services on 22 October 1998. 

Following the November 2001 election, Department of Health and Aged Care became the Department of Health and Ageing. The portfolio also gained the Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service from the Department of Family and Community Services. 

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY

On 18 September 2013, the Department of Industry was established. This website will be updated to reflect Machinery of Government changes in due course.

The Department of Industry helps shape Australia’s future economy through skills, learning, discovery and innovation.

Together with the wider portfolio, the department is working to accelerate productivity growth and secure Australia’s prosperity in a competitive low carbon global economy.

Collaboration, education and a strong science and research base are keys to success. It  is engage with business, research bodies, tertiary education sectors, government and the broader community to create and build economic and social benefits. Its focus is on promoting innovation across the economy and shaping the businesses, industries and workforce to turn these opportunities into outcomes.

DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE

The department's role is to advance the interests of Australia and Australians internationally. This involves working to strengthen Australia's security; enhancing Australia's prosperity; and helping Australian travellers and Australians overseas.

The department provides foreign and trade policy advice to the government. We work with other government agencies to ensure that Australia's pursuit of its global, regional and bilateral interests is coordinated effectively.

History

The Department of Trade and Customs and the Department of External Affairs were among the first seven Commonwealth Departments established at Federation. After nearly 90 years they amalgamated in 1987.

Up to the Second World War, the Department of Trade - and related agencies such as the Department of Commerce - played a greater role in foreign representation than did the Department of External Affairs. "External Affairs" meant in the first decades of Federation a miscellany of "overseas" functions such as immigration, off-shore fisheries, exploration of Papua New Guinea and Antarctica, and Commonwealth Government publicity.

Until the late 1930s, Australia's overseas presence was limited mainly to trade representation and commercial publicity. The 1930s saw an increasingly dangerous economic and political world. Australia realised the need to establish a Trade Commissioner Service (in 1934) and make tentative beginnings towards diplomatic representation abroad.

Role and Assets

The department's role is to advance Australia's national interest. This involves working to strengthen Australia's security and enhance Australia's prosperity.

The department provides foreign and trade policy advice to the government. We work with other government agencies to ensure that Australia's pursuit of its global, regional and bilateral interests is coordinated effectively.

DFAT is the lead agency managing Australia's international presence. We manage a network of 95 overseas posts in five continents and we have over 3600 staff - including locally engaged staff - located in Canberra, state and territory offices and overseas posts.

Our officers are highly skilled at their work which includes developing and implementing foreign and trade policy, negotiating international agreements and delivering high quality consular assistance. This business is often conducted in one of the 29 foreign languages in which DFAT staff are proficient. We have an information, communications and technology (ICT) platform that allows us to transmit classified and unclassified messages quickly across our overseas network.

The department's objective is to reduce the risks and make the most of opportunities for Australia in our regional and global environment. Our purpose is to ensure that our structures - such as procedures for advising ministers, consular contingency planning, passport services, ICT platforms, staff deployment strategies, effective resource management and the scope of overseas representation - are carefully targeted to meet our goals.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

As a central agency of the Australian Government, the Department of Finance  (Finance) plays an important role in assisting government across a wide range of policy areas to ensure its outcomes are met, particularly with regard to expenditure, financial management, and the operations of government.

Essential services delivered by Finance include supporting the delivery of the Australian Government Budget, the ongoing management of the Australian Government’s non-defence domestic property portfolio and key asset sales. Finance is also responsible for the financial framework for Australian Government Agencies. Additionally, Finance provides entitlements advice and support to parliamentarians and their employees, maintains shareholder oversight for Government Business Enterprises (GBEs), provides general insurance services to government agencies and promotes improved risk management. Finance also provides strategic advice, guidance and service provision for the productive application of new and existing information and communication technologies to government operations.

Business Groups

The department is comprised of four business groups. Each group has a page which describes its specific roles and responsibilities, and contains links to documents and web pages relevant to staff within the group.

Budget Group contributes to the outcome “sustainable government finances”. It provides policy and financial advice to the Minister for Finance, senior ministers and Cabinet’s Expenditure Review Committee on government expenditure and non-taxation revenue policy issues.

The Budget embodies the policy priorities and fiscal targets for which the Government seeks Parliamentary authorisation. Budget Group supports the Government in its Budget preparation, delivery and ongoing management through the Budget Process.

Business, Procurement and Asset Management (BPAM) manages the Australian Government´s business and non-Defence property assets, implements and manages the sale or divestment of such assets and handles residual business issues. It is also responsible for the delivery of whole of government information and communications technology services, develops and maintains the Australian Government's procurement policy framework (including the initiation and management of a range of whole-of-government contracts), and manages the special claims, insurance and risk management operations within the Finance portfolio. 

The Chief Operating Officer Group works with the Secretary, Executive Board and other business groups within the Department to enhance, promote and sustain Finance's role as a trusted and professional adviser to the Government.

The Group also provides current parliamentarians and their staff (approximately 1,850), and former Senators and Members, with a range of facilities and services.

The Governance & Resource Management Group (GARM) develops and advises on the resource management framework applicable to public sector agencies, including on governance,  accounting policy issues, the Government’s investment funds (Future Fund and the Nation-building Funds), and on superannuation arrangements for members of Parliament and Commonwealth employees. The Group is also responsible for providing advice on and coordination of government information and advertising campaigns. Additionally the Group consolidates Budget updates, contributes to the preparation of the Budget statements and prepares the Commonwealth's monthly and annual consolidated financial statements.

Through the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO), the Group also provides leadership in the productive application of Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) to government administration, information and services.

First Five History of the Court

Griffith court

As the first High Court, the court under Chief Justice Sir Samuel Griffith had to establish its position as a new court of appeal for the whole of Australia, and had to develop a new body of principle for interpreting the Constitution of Australia and federal legislation. Griffith himself was very much the dominant influence on the court in its early years, but after the appointment of Sir Isaac Isaacs and H. B. Higgins in 1906, and the death of foundation Justice Richard O'Connor, Griffith's influence began to decline.

The court was keen to establish its position at the top of the Australian court hierarchy. In Deakin v Webb (1904) Griffith criticised the Supreme Court of Victoria for following a Privy Council decision about the Constitution of Canada, rather than following the High Court's own decision on the Australian Constitution.

In Australian constitutional law, the early decisions of the court were influenced by United States constitutional law. In the case of D'Emden v Pedder (1904), which involved the application of Tasmanian stamp duty to a federal official's salary, the court adopted the doctrine of implied immunity of instrumentalities which had been established in the United States Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1803).That doctrine established that any attempt by the federal government to interfere with the legislative or executive power of the Australian states was invalid, and vice versa. Accompanying that doctrine was the doctrine of reserved State powers, which was based on the principle that the powers of the Australian parliament should be interpreted narrowly, to avoid intruding on areas of power traditionally exercise by the state parliaments. The concept was developed in such cases as Peterswald v Bartley (1904), R v Barger (1908) and the Union Label case (1908).

Together the two doctrines helped smooth the transition to a federal system of government, and "by preserving a balance between the constituent elements of the Australian federation, probably conformed to community sentiment, which at that stage was by no means adjusted to the exercise of central power." The court had a generally conservative view of the Constitution, taking narrow interpretations of section 116 (which guarantees religious freedom) and section 117 (which prevents discrimination on the basis of someone's state of origin), interpretations that were to last well into the 1980s.

Two of the original judges of the Court, Griffith and Sir Edmund Barton, were frequently consulted by governors-general, including on the exercise of the reserve powers. This practice of consultation has continued from time to time since.

Knox, Isaacs and Gavan Duffy courts

Adrian Knox became Chief Justice on 18 October 1919, and less than three months later, foundation Justice Sir Edmund Barton died, leaving no original members. The most significant case of the era was the Engineers case (1920), decided at the beginning of Knox's term. In that case, the doctrines of reserved State powers and implied immunity of instrumentalities were both overturned, and the court entered a new era of constitutional interpretation in which the focus would fall almost exclusively on the text of the Constitution, and in which the powers of the Australian parliament would gain increasing importance.

Knox was knighted in 1921, the only Chief Justice to be first knighted during his term. Some of the Knox court's early work related to the aftermath of World War I. In Roche v Kronheimer (1921), the Court upheld federal legislation which allowed for the making of regulations to implement Australia's obligations under the Treaty of Versailles. The majority decided the case on the defence power, but Higgins decided it on the external affairs power, the first case to decide that the external affairs power could be used to implement an international treaty in Australia.

Latham court

The court under Chief Justice Sir John Latham, who came to the office in 1935, was punctuated by World War II. Although it dealt with cases in other areas, its most important and lasting work related to wartime legislation, and the transition back to peace following the war.

The court upheld much legislation under the defence power, interpreting it broadly wherever there was a connection to defence purposes, in cases such as Andrews v Howell (1941) and de Mestre v Chisholm (1944). In general, the Curtin Labor government was rarely successfully challenged, the court recognising the necessity that the defence power permit the federal government to govern strongly. The court also allowed the federal government to institute a national income tax scheme in the First Uniform Tax case (1942), and upheld legislation allowing the proclamation of the pacifist Jehovah's Witnesses religion as a subversive organisation, in the Jehovah's Witnesses case (1943).

The court reined in the wide scope of the defence power after the war, allowing for a transitional period. It struck down several key planks of the Chifley Labor government's reconstruction program, notably an attempt to nationalise the banks in the Bank Nationalisation case (1948), and an attempt to establish a comprehensive medical benefits scheme in the First Pharmaceutical Benefits case (1945). However the court also famously struck down Menzies Liberal government legislation banning the Communist Party of Australia in the Communist Party case (1951), Latham's last major case.

Dixon court

Under Chief Justice Sir Owen Dixon, who was elevated to that role in 1952 after 23 years as a puisne Justice, the court enjoyed its most successful period, with British judge, Master of the Rolls Lord Denning, describing the time as the court's "Golden Age".[50] Dixon, widely regarded as Australia's greatest judge, had a commanding personal and legal influence over the court in this time, measurable in the rise in joint judgments (many of which were led by Dixon) and good relations between the Justices.

While there were fewer cases which tested the limits of federal power, which was probably due to the Menzies government which was firmly entrenched in its conservative phase throughout Dixon's tenure, the court did decide several important constitutional cases. Dixon led the court in firmly establishing the separation of powers for the judiciary in the Boilermakers' case (1956), and the court also upheld the continuing existence of the federal government's income tax scheme in the Second Uniform Tax case (1957).

During Dixon's time as Chief Justice, the court came to adopt several of the views that Dixon had advanced in minority opinions in years prior. In several cases, the court upheld Dixon's interpretation of Section 92 (one of the most troublesome sections of the Constitution), which he regarded as guaranteeing a constitutional right to engage in interstate trade, subject to reasonable regulation. It also followed Dixon's interpretation of Section 90 (which prohibits the states from exacting duties of excise), although both these interpretations were ultimately abandoned many years later.

Barwick court

Sir Garfield Barwick came to the court as Chief Justice in 1964. A significant decision of the Barwick court marked the beginning of the modern interpretation of the corporations power, which had been interpreted narrowly since 1909. The Concrete Pipes case (1971) established that the federal parliament could exercise the power to regulate at least the trading activities of corporations, whereas earlier interpretations had allowed only the regulation of conduct or transactions with the public.

The court decided many other significant constitutional cases, including the Seas and Submerged Lands case (1975), upholding legislation asserting sovereignty over the territorial sea; the First (1975) and Second (1977) Territory Senators cases, which concerned whether legislation allowing for the mainland territories to be represented in the Parliament of Australia was valid; and Russell v Russell (1976), which concerned the validity of the Family Law Act 1975. The court also decided several cases relating to the historic 1974 joint sitting of the Parliament of Australia, including Cormack v Cope (1974) and the Petroleum and Minerals Authority case (1975).

The Barwick court decided several infamous cases on tax avoidance and tax evasion, almost always deciding against the taxation office. Led by Barwick himself in most judgments, the court distinguished between avoidance (legitimately minimising one's tax obligations) and evasion (illegally evading obligations). The decisions effectively nullified the anti-avoidance legislation, and led to the proliferation of avoidance schemes in the 1970s, a result which drew much criticism upon the court.